=head1 Darknet Comparison Back to homepage - L There are a number of darknets out there. Different darknets have different features, which any individual may consider as advantages (or disadvantages) depending on his goals. This page attempts to present an accurate comparison between the different darknets known to SRN. In particular, SRN has attempted to avoid being unjustly critical of AnoNet1 even after having been a victim of AnoNet1's ugly side on multiple occasions (although obviously, no attempt has been made to avoid "earned" criticism). If you'd like to add other darknets to this table, keep in mind that all of anonet2.org is freely editable from within AnoNet. If none of the existing darknets suit your needs, you're encouraged to advertise your new one here. You're also more than welcome to spam AnoNet IRC for new members, but if your advertisements get redundant and boring and redundant and repetitive and redundant after a while, don't be surprised if people start bing you. (Please don't let that discourage you, if you truly believe your new darknet is worth joining. You may want to rethink your advertising strategy, though.) You may also be able to get help in planning and/or building a new darknet on AnoNet IRC. Please keep in mind that this comparison is mostly focused on relative anonymity value, rather than, say, the quality of the available social networks. If the latter is more important to you than the former, you're almost certainly wasting your time here. If you'd like to understand more about the mechanics of anonymity, L. =begin html
Overview
 AnoNet1AnoNet2dn42VAnet
Claimed Purposeanonymity to prevent censorshipanonymity to prevent censorshiphave fun with BGPfreedom and network efficiency
Claimed Governmentnearly nonenonenearly nonebackbone only
Actual Governmentoligarchynonenearly nonebackbone only
Actual Government betrays Claimed Purposeyesnonono
Centralized Critical Infrastructurewiki (includes resource database), client port, IRCnonewiki, IRCall
Decentralized Critical Infrastructureroutingallrouting, resource databasenone
Current Size20-30~1040-50<5
Average Monthly Growth~0%~20%~5%~10%
Activity Levelmediummediummediumlow
Interdarknet Connectivitycensored access to AnoNet2 (must use AnoNet2 DNS), censored access to dn42 (must use AnoNet2 DNS)full routing to part of AnoNet1, full routing to part of dn42, full routing to VAnetcensored access to AnoNet (1&2, must use SRN's DNS), censored access to VAnet (must use SRN's DNS)full routing to part of AnoNet1, full routing to AnoNet2, full routing to part of dn42
DNS CoverageAnoNet1AnoNet (1&2), dn42, VAnet, IcannNetdn42, IcannNetAnoNet (1&2), dn42, VAnet, IcannNet
Peering PrerequisitesOpenVPN, BGP daemon, sustained IRC participation for over a monthOpenVPN or tinc or quicktun, BGP daemon or static routingOpenVPN, BGP daemon or static routingdepends on individual PoP policy
Services
 AnoNet1AnoNet2dn42VAnet
Routingdecentralizeddecentralizeddecentralizedcentralized
Resource Databasecentralized (part of wiki)decentralized (part of git-based resdb)decentralized (part of monotone-based registry)centralized (ask Borg)
Documentationcentralized (crzydmnd's wiki)decentralized (part of git-based resdb)centralized (helios's wiki)centralized (vanet.org)
Chatroomcentralized (single IRCnet)decentralized (ad-hoc relaying between IRC and Jabber chatrooms)semicentralized (single IRCnet, with a Jabber chatroom relay)decentralized (shared with AnoNet2)
DNScentralized (from wiki), several official "rootservers"decentralized (from resdb), each user fields his own, public nameservers available for the lazydecentralized (from registry), multiple competing deploymentscentralized (from svn), centralized official deployment
BitTorrent Trackers/Indexersnone?1 centralized and 1 decentralized (git-based)1 centralized1 centralized
=end html